|
STILL
<in> MOTION - 38 Artists 14 Authors It is that
anxiety to achieve fresh success and miraculous changes which constantly
obliges us to avoid living in the present in order to project ourselves
towards the expectation of the immediate future to come. Or rather,
he who lives wounds himself. Almost a duty, certified and codified by
advertising, by that which makes and is the fashion. With zapper or
mouse in hand we are the masters of our future and the guarantors of
reality, punchdrunk with millions of more or less reassuring images
which promise us great novelties and unexpected developments. As it
seems taken for granted by now, marketing counts for more than meditation,
know-how beats imagination by two lengths: the objectives pursued through
strategies blast every reflection upon what has been or now is in life.
LipanjePuntin Artecontemporanea has celebrated its fifth anniversary,
and has done so also at the moment when " particularly in art "
the general password is spectacle, showing oneself off in order to reach
the great-est number of interlocutors. So here we are ready to plan
our future, serving up more or less original ideas, unusual objectives
and relevant strategies. The result? Still <in> Motion is born,
an exhibition, a book, at bottom an opportunity not to be missed to
reflect upon our, albeit brief, gallery excursus. If the idea of asking
a group of artists and writers to debate upon the relation between stasis
and movement, motionlessness and dynamism, mobility and immobility has
on the one hand produced works and results that are, to say the least,
surprising, on the other hand it has led us, curators and gallery-owners,
to quite opposite conclusions. Instead of planning objectives and strategies
we have found ourselves discussing present and past, all agreeing in
maintaining that, if the present is movement and becomes past the very
moment it is named, the future, dark and unforeseeable, is static and
motionless until it becomes present, at which point, however, it will
already be past. Does a work of art, whether it be a painting, a sculpture,
or a video-installation (just like a building or a table) always remain
the same in the course of time? And its interpretation, its meaning
or the critical analyses of it are they destined to change? Without
pretence of even wanting to answer exhaustively Still <in> Motion
intends first and foremost to be homage to the art we prefer, to that
art which has won us over and which begs us to remain still to reflect,
to think, beseeching of us a steadfast and ever-greater attention. |
||